Charlie Quant Lab
All research

Concentrated.Not tied to one system.

$26.3bn is borrowed. Remove Aave V3 and $13.9bn still remains.

14 systems with complete borrowing figures, selected from up to 16 of the largest above $100M in reported value
Money supplied$46.3bnstill available
Money taken$26.3bnborrowed across the tracked group
Share in use36.2%of supplied money
Largest system47.1%Aave V3 share
73.6%of borrowing sits in the top three
52.9%remains after the largest is removed
What this page does

It follows money from lenders to borrowers, shows what protects each loan, and explains where a loss may land.

Money taken and money waiting

Borrowed money is already with borrowers. Available money is supplied but has not been borrowed.

01Aave V3
$12.4bn$17.3bn free41.8% in use
02Morpho Blue
$4.9bn$9.7bn free33.4% in use
03SparkLend
$2.1bn$4.5bn free31.7% in use
04Maple
$1.8bn$3.1bn free37.1% in use
05Kamino Lend
$1.0bn$1.3bn free43.6% in use
06Jupiter Lend
$929mn$1.1bn free45.9% in use
07Fluid Lending
$832mn$750mn free52.6% in use
08Compound V3
$626mn$1.4bn free30.7% in use
09Euler V2
$450mn$349mn free56.3% in use
10Venus Core Pool
$446mn$1.3bn free25.7% in use
11HyperLend Pooled
$304mn$557mn free35.3% in use
12Aave V4
$224mn$378mn free37.2% in use
13JustLend V1
$197mn$3.7bn free5.1% in use
14Lista Lending
$71.1mn$854mn free7.7% in use
BorrowedStill available

The useful read: Aave V3 is the largest borrower-facing system in this group, but size alone does not tell us whether its loans are safe or its lenders can leave quickly.

Does the market disappear without its leader?

No. Removing Aave V3 cuts the total sharply, but more than half of tracked borrowing remains.

The top three still carry 73.6%. The market is broad enough to survive a one-system removal test, yet concentrated enough that the leaders still matter.

What keeps a secured loan standing

The name on the app is only the front door. The money, protection and exit sit underneath it.

1

A lender supplies money

A saver, company or managed pool puts money where borrowers can take it.

2

The borrower locks more value

The borrower posts an asset worth more than the loan. That extra value is the first protection.

3

A price is watched

The system checks whether the locked asset still covers the debt.

4

The asset may be sold

If the safety margin breaks, the locked asset can be sold to repay the lender.

If the sale is fast enoughThe debt can be repaid from the locked asset./If the price falls too fastA shortfall may remain after the sale.

One contract, under a magnifying glass

Morpho is useful here because its market-level fields cover Ethereum and Base. This one example does not stand for the whole credit market.

USDC loan backed by cbBTC

Morpho contract on Base
Money borrowed$1.4bn
Still available$163mn
Pool in use89.4%
Maximum loan vs locked value86.0%
Customer-facing productNot identified here
Price sourceNot in this edition

Contract market 0x9103c3b4e8...

How the loss path works: if the loan crosses this contract's maximum loan-versus-collateral rule, the position can be sold. The field does not promise that the sale will cover every dollar.

Issued is not the same as borrowed

$53.2bn of non-stablecoin tokenized assets are tracked across the wider market. This tells us what exists onchain, not how much protects a loan.

The useful limit: issuance proves an asset exists. It does not prove a borrower used it, a lender accepted it, or a loan was made against it.

Where the trouble lands first

These are separate failure paths. They should not be squeezed into one risk score.

The locked asset falls slowly

It can be sold before the loan becomes too large.

Borrower loses the locked asset. Lender is repaid first.

The price falls too fast

The sale may bring back less money than the borrower owes.

The lender, reserve or insurer may carry the shortfall.

The price check is wrong

A borrower may be sold too early, or a weak loan may remain open too long.

Loss depends on which error occurred.

The contract itself fails

Collateral rules may work as written and users can still lose money through faulty code or control.

The affected users carry the loss unless protection exists elsewhere.

Read any loan with four questions

Ignore the product name at first. If one answer is missing, that is where the review begins.

01

Who supplies the money?

Name the depositors, treasury or managed pool, not only the app shown to customers.

02

What protects the loan?

Name the locked asset, the price check and the point at which it can be sold.

03

How can money leave?

Can lenders withdraw now, must they wait for repayment, or do they need another buyer?

04

Who carries a loss?

Name the party left short if the asset falls too fast, the price is wrong or the contract fails.