Across 98 usable pairs covering 64 assets.
Crypto.com
This page shows what Crypto.com looks like through market depth, trading concentration and public disclosure. It does not turn those readings into a solvency claim.
the price
$521m
$129m resting24.7% of a day's trading
One day of trading rests on $129m of orders, which is 24.7% of it.
Orange is reported 24-hour volume. The blue band is quoted depth within 2% of the price, estimated across both directions and drawn at the same scale. Of what Crypto.com reported, 100% was measurable here across its busiest 98 pairs.
What this venue carries.
Reported 24-hour volume, quoted depth near the price, and the ratio between them.
Estimated across both directions. Depth rank 21 of 60 on the board.
Rank 39 of 60. The typical venue reports 5.6x.
Charlie's inferenceCrypto.com does not show that split today. Its quote and its book point the same way. Its average spread is 0.014%, which ranks 4 of 60 from tightest. A tight quote is a price gap. The book shows how much was posted near it at the read.
The broad view, with every part left visible.
The profile joins six market readings. It does not include liabilities, customer assets or withdrawal completion, so it is not a safety score.
Broad support across the measured market readings
Latest seven-day average against the previous seven days.
Latest seven-day average against the first seven days in the window.
$200m, or 38% of measured venue trading.
Against venues its own size.
Comparing a small venue with the largest tells you little. These are the exchanges nearest to it in reported volume, from $430m to $583m, and their volume-to-depth ratios.
Charlie's inferenceThe middle of this size band reports 6.4x volume-to-depth. That is the closer comparison, not the full-market average.
What it leans on.
Concentration, one-sidedness and how much survives once the two legs everything trades against are removed.
38% of its trading. Its top three pairs are 76%.
Zero would mean buying and selling cost the same. Higher means the book supports one direction more than the other.
Of its trading survives that removal, and 33% of its depth.
What has been reported.
Headlines from the last three weeks that name this exchange. This is testimony, not measurement, and it is kept apart from every figure above on purpose. A tag marks a story worth reading, not a finding.
- Crypto.com-Linked Lending Platform Hit by $74 Million HackBloomberg.com · 31 Aug 2026security incident
- Crypto.com's Cronos Halts Entire Blockchain After $75M Tectonic ExploitDecrypt · 31 Aug 2026withdrawals or trading haltedsecurity incident
- Trump's Truth Social Files Two New Crypto ETFs - Including One For Crypto.com's CRO TokenYellow.com · 04 Sep 2026
- Crypto.com-linked lending platform hit by $74m exploitMoneyweb · 31 Aug 2026security incident
What it publishes, and what this page will not say.
Third-party attestation, periodic.
Listed pairs marked stale or odd, removed before any figure here.
Nothing on this page describes what this company owes or holds for customers. Order-book data cannot answer that.
What can actually be checked for Crypto.com?
Open a group to see what is measured, what is only partly known, and what this page refuses to guess.
Market quality live or matched readings
Reported 24h tradingCurrent measured pairs$521m
Depth within 2%Both sides added together$129m
Trading versus depthLower means more book for the flow4.0x
Average price gapWeighted by pair trading0.014%
Book one-sidednessHigher means one direction is thinner3%
Busiest-pair shareBTC/USD38%
Bitcoin-linked leaderBTC/USD$200m
Trading beyond BTC and USDTShare that survives removing both legs33%
Seven-day trading changeMatched seven-day averages-22.6%
Reserves and disclosure public evidence only
Direct reserve or financial pageThird-party attestationDirect page recorded
Refresh patternFrequency claimed by the public recordperiodic
Liabilities includedAssets alone cannot prove solvencyNot established here
Reserve ratio by assetA blended percentage can hide a weak assetNot measured
Own-token shareSelf-issued collateral needs a separate checkNot measured
Wallet ownership confidenceLabels are not treated as signed ownershipNot measured
Snapshot balance movementNeeds matched wallet history around disclosure datesNot measured
Withdrawals and operations not inferred from the book
Withdrawal timeNeeds repeated real completion timesNot measured
Withdrawal interruptionsNeeds a dated operating recordNot measured
Matching-engine outagesNeeds an independent incident recordNot measured
Status-page honestySilence is not counted as uptimeNot measured
Deposit crediting delayNeeds controlled testsNot measured
Live small-withdrawal checkNo customer funds are moved by this public pageNot run
Derivatives pressure kept separate
Open interest versus reservesNeeds comparable liabilities and collateralNot measured
Funding against peersNeeds a separate derivatives venue mapNot measured
Insurance fundSize and change both matterNot measured
Auto-deleveraging and clawbacksNeeds a dated event historyNot measured
Maximum leverage changesA level without its change says littleNot measured
Company, rules and security requires named records
Licences and register changesJurisdiction and legal entity must matchNot joined here
Enforcement and litigationAllegations and final orders stay separateNot joined here
Executive and auditor departuresChanges matter more than a static rosterNot joined here
Hack history and repaymentLoss and customer recovery are different factsNot joined here
Banking and custody dependenceProvider concentration needs named linksNot joined here
Traffic, downloads and jobsBusiness activity is not balance-sheet strengthNot joined here