Across 98 usable pairs covering 48 assets.
Bitfinex
This page shows what Bitfinex looks like through market depth, trading concentration and public disclosure. It does not turn those readings into a solvency claim.
the price
$233m
$208m resting89.6% of a day's trading
One day of trading rests on $208m of orders, which is 89.6% of it.
Orange is reported 24-hour volume. The blue band is quoted depth within 2% of the price, estimated across both directions and drawn at the same scale. Of what Bitfinex reported, 100% was measurable here across its busiest 98 pairs.
What this venue carries.
Reported 24-hour volume, quoted depth near the price, and the ratio between them.
Estimated across both directions. Depth rank 11 of 60 on the board.
Rank 52 of 60. The typical venue reports 5.6x.
Charlie's inferenceBitfinex does not show that split today. Its quote and its book point the same way. Its average spread is 0.062%, which ranks 44 of 60 from tightest. A tight quote is a price gap. The book shows how much was posted near it at the read.
The broad view, with every part left visible.
The profile joins six market readings. It does not include liabilities, customer assets or withdrawal completion, so it is not a safety score.
Mixed market readings
Latest seven-day average against the previous seven days.
Latest seven-day average against the first seven days in the window.
$88.4m, or 38% of measured venue trading.
Against venues its own size.
Comparing a small venue with the largest tells you little. These are the exchanges nearest to it in reported volume, from $219m to $242m, and their volume-to-depth ratios.
Charlie's inferenceThe middle of this size band reports 5.2x volume-to-depth. That is the closer comparison, not the full-market average.
What it leans on.
Concentration, one-sidedness and how much survives once the two legs everything trades against are removed.
38% of its trading. Its top three pairs are 76%.
Zero would mean buying and selling cost the same. Higher means the book supports one direction more than the other.
Of its trading survives that removal, and 17% of its depth.
What has been reported.
Headlines from the last three weeks that name this exchange. This is testimony, not measurement, and it is kept apart from every figure above on purpose. A tag marks a story worth reading, not a finding.
- Bitfinex Securities raises $50 million in push to offer tokenized nickel tradingCoinDesk · 27 Aug 2026regulatory penalty
- Bitfinex Securities Lists Tokenized Notes Tied to Bitcoin StocksCoinTrust · 04 Sep 2026regulatory penalty
- Bitfinex Reports Historical Bearish Trend for BitcoinCoinfomania · 03 Sep 2026regulatory penalty
- Bitcoin downside looks limited above $76,350: Bitfinex analystsCryptonews.net · 02 Sep 2026regulatory penalty
What it publishes, and what this page will not say.
Third-party attestation, periodic.
Listed pairs marked stale or odd, removed before any figure here.
Nothing on this page describes what this company owes or holds for customers. Order-book data cannot answer that.
What can actually be checked for Bitfinex?
Open a group to see what is measured, what is only partly known, and what this page refuses to guess.
Market quality live or matched readings
Reported 24h tradingCurrent measured pairs$233m
Depth within 2%Both sides added together$208m
Trading versus depthLower means more book for the flow1.1x
Average price gapWeighted by pair trading0.062%
Book one-sidednessHigher means one direction is thinner6%
Busiest-pair shareBTC/USD38%
Bitcoin-linked leaderBTC/USD$88.4m
Trading beyond BTC and USDTShare that survives removing both legs11%
Seven-day trading changeMatched seven-day averages+23.3%
Reserves and disclosure public evidence only
Direct reserve or financial pageThird-party attestationDirect page recorded
Refresh patternFrequency claimed by the public recordperiodic
Liabilities includedAssets alone cannot prove solvencyNot established here
Reserve ratio by assetA blended percentage can hide a weak assetNot measured
Own-token shareSelf-issued collateral needs a separate checkNot measured
Wallet ownership confidenceLabels are not treated as signed ownershipNot measured
Snapshot balance movementNeeds matched wallet history around disclosure datesNot measured
Withdrawals and operations not inferred from the book
Withdrawal timeNeeds repeated real completion timesNot measured
Withdrawal interruptionsNeeds a dated operating recordNot measured
Matching-engine outagesNeeds an independent incident recordNot measured
Status-page honestySilence is not counted as uptimeNot measured
Deposit crediting delayNeeds controlled testsNot measured
Live small-withdrawal checkNo customer funds are moved by this public pageNot run
Derivatives pressure kept separate
Open interest versus reservesNeeds comparable liabilities and collateralNot measured
Funding against peersNeeds a separate derivatives venue mapNot measured
Insurance fundSize and change both matterNot measured
Auto-deleveraging and clawbacksNeeds a dated event historyNot measured
Maximum leverage changesA level without its change says littleNot measured
Company, rules and security requires named records
Licences and register changesJurisdiction and legal entity must matchNot joined here
Enforcement and litigationAllegations and final orders stay separateNot joined here
Executive and auditor departuresChanges matter more than a static rosterNot joined here
Hack history and repaymentLoss and customer recovery are different factsNot joined here
Banking and custody dependenceProvider concentration needs named linksNot joined here
Traffic, downloads and jobsBusiness activity is not balance-sheet strengthNot joined here